DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1990 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

45.25–45.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeGAZ
Space RunnerModel31
1992Model year1990
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
155 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
82 HPPower100 HP
172 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption15 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4960 mm
1695 mmWidth1800 mm
1665 mmHeight1422 mm
1260 KgWeight1450 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1990 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…