DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1992 Ford Scorpio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Scorpio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
Space RunnerModelScorpio
1992Model year1992
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
155 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
82 HPPower90 HP
172 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4744 mm
1695 mmWidth1766 mm
1665 mmHeight1450 mm
1260 KgWeight1260 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2761 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1992 Ford Scorpio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Scorpio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…