DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1992 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Escort

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
Space RunnerModelEscort
1992Model year1992
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
155 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1555 cc
82 HPPower76 HP
172 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank64 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R13 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4036 mm
1695 mmWidth1692 mm
1665 mmHeight1369 mm
1260 KgWeight1065 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1992 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Escort leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…