DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1998 Chrysler Neon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeChrysler
Space RunnerModelNeon
1998Model year1998
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
133 HPPower147 HP
176 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank42 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,6 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4364 mm
1695 mmWidth1714 mm
1665 mmHeight1369 mm
1210 KgWeight—
2520 mmWheelbase2642 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1998 Chrysler Neon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…