DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Chrysler Neon vs 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeMitsubishi
NeonModelSpace Runner
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
147 HPPower133 HP
174 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4364 mmLength4270 mm
1714 mmWidth1695 mm
1369 mmHeight1665 mm
—Weight1210 Kg
2642 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Chrysler Neon and 1998 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…