DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1999 Holden Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHolden
Space RunnerModelFrontera
1999Model year1999
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
185 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
178 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size235/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4192 mm
1695 mmWidth1780 mm
1650 mmHeight1721 mm
1300 KgWeight1828 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1999 Holden Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…