1999 • Chrysler
Neon
Chrysler Neon 2.0 i 16V (147 Hp) 1999Overall Score52.5/100
1999 Chrysler Neon vs 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mitsubishi
Space Runner
Mitsubishi Space Runner 2.0 (136 Hp) 1999Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Space Runner
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
ChryslerMakeMitsubishi
NeonModelSpace Runner
1999Model year1999
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
8,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
147 HPPower136 HP
174 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption12,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
4364 mmLength4290 mm
1714 mmWidth1695 mm
1369 mmHeight1650 mm
—Weight1300 Kg
2642 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Chrysler Neon and 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…