DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1999 Chrysler Neon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeChrysler
Space RunnerModelNeon
1999Model year1999
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
136 HPPower147 HP
178 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank42 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4364 mm
1695 mmWidth1714 mm
1650 mmHeight1369 mm
1300 KgWeight—
2550 mmWheelbase2642 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1999 Chrysler Neon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…