DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1999 Renault Espace Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
Space RunnerModelEspace
1999Model year1999
MinivanBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
180 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
122 HPPower98 HP
161 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4517 mm
1695 mmWidth1810 mm
1640 mmHeight1773 mm
1228 KgWeight1520 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2702 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1999 Renault Espace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…