DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Renault Espace vs 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMitsubishi
EspaceModelSpace Runner
1999Model year1999
Minivan, MPVBody typeMinivan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
167 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
98 HPPower122 HP
200 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,6 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4517 mmLength4290 mm
1810 mmWidth1695 mm
1773 mmHeight1640 mm
1520 KgWeight1228 Kg
2702 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Renault Espace and 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…