DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1990 Audi 90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
Space RunnerModel90
1991Model year1990
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h14,6 s
180 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
122 HPPower80 HP
161 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4393 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1640 mmHeight1397 mm
1228 KgWeight1090 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2546 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1990 Audi 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…