1990 • Audi
90
Audi 90 1.6 TD (80 Hp) 1990Overall Score54.25/100
1990 Audi 90 vs 1991 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1991 • Mitsubishi
Space Runner
Mitsubishi Space Runner 1.8 (N11W) 1991Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Audi 90
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 90SpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
AudiMakeMitsubishi
90ModelSpace Runner
1990Model year1991
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 90SpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
14,6 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
174 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
80 HPPower122 HP
155 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 90SpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,3 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 90SpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 90SpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
4393 mmLength4290 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1397 mmHeight1640 mm
1090 KgWeight1228 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2520 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Audi 90 and 1991 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi 90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…