DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Sigma vs 1996 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Sigma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMercedes-Benz
SigmaModelE Serisi
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
220 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2996 cc
177 HPPower136 HP
251 NmTorque210 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4795 mm
1775 mmWidth1799 mm
1435 mmHeight1437 mm
1468 KgWeight1560 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2833 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Sigma and 1996 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Sigma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…