DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi vs 1996 Mitsubishi Sigma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Sigma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeMitsubishi
E SerisiModelSigma
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
205 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2996 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
136 HPPower177 HP
210 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank72 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4795 mmLength4750 mm
1799 mmWidth1775 mm
1437 mmHeight1435 mm
1560 KgWeight1468 Kg
2833 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi and 1996 Mitsubishi Sigma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Sigma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…