DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Mitsubishi Sigma vs 1990 Pontiac 6000 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac 6000

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakePontiac
SigmaModel6000
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement3135 cc
177 HPPower141 HP
251 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
205/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4795 mm
1775 mmWidth1830 mm
1435 mmHeight1365 mm
1468 KgWeight1275 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2665 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Mitsubishi Sigma and 1990 Pontiac 6000 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac 6000 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…