DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1990 Mitsubishi Sigma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeMitsubishi
CutlassModelSigma
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
185 km/hTop speed220 km/h
3135 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
141 HPPower177 HP
251 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank72 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4921 mmLength4750 mm
1804 mmWidth1775 mm
1391 mmHeight1435 mm
1450 KgWeight1468 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1990 Mitsubishi Sigma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…