DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Santamo vs 2003 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Santamo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeGAZ
SantamoModel31
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
175 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2134 cc
139 HPPower110 HP
178 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4515 mmLength4870 mm
1695 mmWidth1800 mm
1620 mmHeight1422 mm
1450 KgWeight1560 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Santamo and 2003 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Santamo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…