DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GAZ 31 vs 2003 Mitsubishi Santamo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Santamo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeMitsubishi
31ModelSantamo
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
155 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2134 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
110 HPPower139 HP
250 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Average consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4870 mmLength4515 mm
1800 mmWidth1695 mm
1422 mmHeight1620 mm
1560 KgWeight1450 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GAZ 31 and 2003 Mitsubishi Santamo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Santamo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…