DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Pajero vs 2000 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Pajero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

49.5–48.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeGAZ
PajeroModel31
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h21,0 s
145 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
115 HPPower90 HP
240 NmTorque1726 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank55 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
9,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/80 R16 STyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4260 mmLength4885 mm
1845 mmWidth1800 mm
1845 mmHeight1576 mm
1785 KgWeight1540 Kg
2545 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Pajero and 2000 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Pajero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…