DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda 3 vs 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Pajero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
3ModelPajero
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed168 km/h
2191 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
380 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank68 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption—
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size265/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4785 mm
1795 mmWidth1815 mm
1450 mmHeight1800-1805 mm
1320 KgWeight1900 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda 3 and 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Pajero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…