DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2005 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Outlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeKia
OutlanderModelOptima
2005Model year2005
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
169 km/hTop speed208 km/h
2350 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
142 HPPower144 HP
213 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4550 mmLength4735 mm
1750 mmWidth1805 mm
1605 mmHeight1480 mm
1500 KgWeight1408 Kg
2878 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2005 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Outlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…