DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Kia Optima vs 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Outlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMitsubishi
OptimaModelOutlander
2005Model year2005
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
208 km/hTop speed169 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2350 cc
144 HPPower142 HP
188 NmTorque213 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/60 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4735 mmLength4550 mm
1805 mmWidth1750 mm
1480 mmHeight1605 mm
1408 KgWeight1500 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2878 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Kia Optima and 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Outlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…