DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Outlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
OutlanderModelLancer
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2360 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
167 HPPower148 HP
222 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank59 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
CVTGears5
225/55 R18Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4625 mm
1800 mmWidth1760 mm
1680 mmHeight1480-1505 mm
1505 KgWeight1310 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Outlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…