DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Outlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
LancerModelOutlander
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2360 cc
148 HPPower167 HP
197 NmTorque222 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5GearsCVT
205/60 R16Tyre size225/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4625 mmLength4695 mm
1760 mmWidth1800 mm
1480-1505 mmHeight1680 mm
1310 KgWeight1505 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Outlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…