DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2018 Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMazda
OutlanderModelCX-3
2018Model year2018
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque207 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank44 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4275 mm
1810 mmWidth1765 mm
1680 mmHeight1535 mm
1600 KgWeight1256-1310 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2018 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…