DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Mazda CX-3 vs 2018 Mitsubishi Outlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
CX-3ModelOutlander
2018Model year2018
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
207 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
44 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4695 mm
1765 mmWidth1810 mm
1535 mmHeight1680 mm
1256-1310 KgWeight1600 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Mazda CX-3 and 2018 Mitsubishi Outlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…