2012 • Mitsubishi
Outlander
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.2 (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.5/100
2012 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2010 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi (150 Hp) 2010Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi OutlanderSpecificationFord C-Max
MitsubishiMakeFord
OutlanderModelC-Max
2012Model year2010
SUVBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi OutlanderSpecificationFord C-Max
10,2 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
200 km/hTop speed204 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque240 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi OutlanderSpecificationFord C-Max
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mitsubishi OutlanderSpecificationFord C-Max
4665 mmLength4380 mm
1800 mmWidth1828 mm
1680 mmHeight1626 mm
1590 KgWeight1385 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2010 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…