DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Ford C-Max vs 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
C-MaxModelOutlander
2012Model year2012
MPVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
204 km/hTop speed200 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
240 NmTorque380 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4380 mmLength4665 mm
1828 mmWidth1800 mm
1626 mmHeight1680 mm
1385 KgWeight1590 Kg
—Wheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Ford C-Max and 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…