1998 • Audi
A6
Audi A6 2.7 T V6 (230 Hp) 1998Overall Score74.75/100
1998 Audi A6 vs 2000 Mitsubishi GTO Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
GTO
Mitsubishi GTO 3.0 i V6 4WD (225 Hp) 2000Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
Audi A6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
74.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A6SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
AudiMakeMitsubishi
A6ModelGTO
1998Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Audi A6SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
7,1 s0–100 km/h—
245 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2671 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
230 HPPower225 HP
310 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A6SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
16,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,6 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Audi A6SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
4796 mmLength4575 mm
1810 mmWidth1840 mm
1451 mmHeight1285 mm
1635 KgWeight1640 Kg
2759 mmWheelbase2470 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Audi A6 and 2000 Mitsubishi GTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…