DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi GTO vs 1998 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

74.5–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
GTOModelA6
2000Model year1998
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,1 s
220 km/hTop speed245 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2671 cc
225 HPPower230 HP
275 NmTorque310 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption16,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption11,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
225/50 R17 VTyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4796 mm
1840 mmWidth1810 mm
1285 mmHeight1451 mm
1640 KgWeight1635 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2759 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi GTO and 1998 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…