DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Legnum vs 2002 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Legnum

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeOpel
LegnumModelOmega
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
175 HPPower150 HP
222 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16VTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4898 mm
1760 mmWidth1775 mm
1470 mmHeight1450 mm
1550 KgWeight1610 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Legnum and 2002 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Legnum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…