DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Omega vs 2002 Mitsubishi Legnum Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Legnum

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMitsubishi
OmegaModelLegnum
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h—
206 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
150 HPPower175 HP
300 NmTorque222 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size225/50 R16V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4740 mm
1775 mmWidth1760 mm
1450 mmHeight1470 mm
1610 KgWeight1550 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Omega and 2002 Mitsubishi Legnum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Legnum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…