1999 • Mitsubishi
Legnum
Mitsubishi Legnum 2.5 VR-4 Type-S 4WD (280 Hp) 1999Overall Score74.75/100
1999 Mitsubishi Legnum vs 2000 Mitsubishi Legnum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Legnum
Mitsubishi Legnum 2.5 VR-4 Type-S 4WD (280 Hp) 2000Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Legnum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
74.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LegnumSpecificationMitsubishi Legnum
MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
LegnumModelLegnum
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi LegnumSpecificationMitsubishi Legnum
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
363 NmTorque363 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LegnumSpecificationMitsubishi Legnum
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/50 R16VTyre size225/50 R16V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LegnumSpecificationMitsubishi Legnum
4740 mmLength4740 mm
1760 mmWidth1760 mm
1470 mmHeight1470 mm
1550 KgWeight1550 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2635 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Mitsubishi Legnum and 2000 Mitsubishi Legnum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Legnum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSMitsubishi Galant vs Mitsubishi Legnum2000 and 1999 model yearsVSMitsubishi Legnum vs Mitsubishi Legnum2000 and 1999 model years
VSToyota Chaser vs Mitsubishi Legnum2000 and 1999 model years
VSToyota Crown vs Mitsubishi Legnum2000 and 1999 model years
VSNissan Cedric vs Mitsubishi Legnum2000 and 1999 model yearsComments are loading…