DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
LancerModelLancer
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
245 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
265 HPPower280 HP
355 NmTorque383 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/45 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength4455 mm
1770 mmWidth1770 mm
1450 mmHeight1450 mm
1410 KgWeight1380 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…