2004 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.3 20V (250 Hp) 2004Overall Score79.5/100
2004 Volvo S60 vs 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0i 16V (265 Hp) 2005Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Volvo S60
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S60SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
S60ModelLancer
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S60SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
6,8 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
250 km/hTop speed245 km/h
2319 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
250 HPPower265 HP
330 NmTorque355 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S60SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
—Average consumption10,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S60SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/55 R16Tyre size235/45 R17
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S60SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4576 mmLength4490 mm
1804 mmWidth1770 mm
1428 mmHeight1450 mm
1537 KgWeight1410 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2625 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo S60 and 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…