2003 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0i 16V (135 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2003 MG ZS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • MG
ZS
MG ZS 2.0 TDi (113 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
MG ZS
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationMG ZS
MitsubishiMakeMG
LancerModelZS
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationMG ZS
9,7 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
204 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
135 HPPower113 HP
176 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationMG ZS
4480 mmLength4520 mm
1695 mmWidth1700 mm
1445 mmHeight1390 mm
1270 KgWeight1225 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2003 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSMercedes-Benz Vaneo vs Mitsubishi Lancer2003 and 2003 model years
VSBMW Z3 vs Mitsubishi Lancer2003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSMG ZR vs Mitsubishi Lancer2003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSMG ZS vs Mitsubishi Lancer2003 and 2003 model years
VSRover 25 vs Mitsubishi Lancer2003 and 2003 model yearsComments are loading…