DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeMitsubishi
ZSModelLancer
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
193 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
113 HPPower135 HP
260 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4480 mm
1700 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1445 mm
1225 KgWeight1270 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…