DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2016 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMazda
LancerModelCX-5
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
200 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower165 HP
198 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank56 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4570 mmLength4555 mm
1760 mmWidth1840 mm
1505 mmHeight1710 mm
1365 KgWeight1315 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2016 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…