DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2008 Cadillac BLS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCadillac
LancerModelBLS
2004Model year2008
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

5,9 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
250 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
280 HPPower210 HP
383 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength4680 mm
1770 mmWidth1752 mm
1450 mmHeight1471 mm
1320 KgWeight—
2625 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2008 Cadillac BLS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…