DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mazda 6 vs 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
6ModelLancer
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

6,6 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
240 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
260 HPPower280 HP
380 NmTorque383 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
14,0 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/45 R18 YTyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4490 mm
1780 mmWidth1770 mm
1430 mmHeight1450 mm
1590 KgWeight1320 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mazda 6 and 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…