DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Toyota RAV4 vs 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota RAV4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMitsubishi
RAV4ModelLancer
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1987 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
151 HPPower148 HP
196 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank59 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/65 R17 HTyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4605 mmLength4625 mm
1845 mmWidth1760 mm
1675 mmHeight1480-1505 mm
1490-1585 KgWeight1310 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Toyota RAV4 and 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…