DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2003 Hyundai XG Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai XG

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHyundai
L 200ModelXG
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

142 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
100 HPPower139 HP
240 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4865 mm
1655 mmWidth1825 mm
1570 mmHeight1420 mm
1810 KgWeight1865 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2003 Hyundai XG approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai XG leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…