DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2015 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSubaru
L 200ModelForester
2013Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
179 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
178 HPPower175 HP
400 NmTorque235 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears—
—Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5185 mmLength4595 mm
1750 mmWidth1795 mm
1775 mmHeight1735 mm
1900 KgWeight1513 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2015 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…