DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Peugeot 308 vs 2013 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeMitsubishi
308ModelL 200
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
202 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
163 HPPower178 HP
340 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
225/45 R17V; 225/40 R18VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength5185 mm
1815 mmWidth1750 mm
1564 mmHeight1775 mm
1603 KgWeight1900 Kg
2708 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Peugeot 308 and 2013 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…