DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2012 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeJeep
L 200ModelCompass
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h10,90 s
179 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
178 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque320 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5185 mmLength4448 mm
1750 mmWidth1812 mm
1775 mmHeight1718 mm
1900 KgWeight1680 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2012 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…