DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jeep Compass vs 2012 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMitsubishi
CompassModelL 200
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,90 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
201 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
163 HPPower178 HP
320 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank75 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4448 mmLength5185 mm
1812 mmWidth1750 mm
1718 mmHeight1775 mm
1680 KgWeight1900 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jeep Compass and 2012 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…