DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2016 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.25 points.

62.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
L 200ModelFocus
2013Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
167 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
136 HPPower105 HP
314 NmTorque150 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16; 215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5185 mmLength4358 mm
1750 mmWidth1823 mm
1775 mmHeight1484 mm
1870 KgWeight1264 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2648 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2016 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…