DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo XC90 vs 2013 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
XC90ModelL 200
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
0 km/hTop speed167 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
163 HPPower136 HP
340 NmTorque314 Nm
5Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank75 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4807 mmLength5185 mm
1936 mmWidth1750 mm
1784 mmHeight1775 mm
2139 KgWeight1870 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo XC90 and 2013 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…