DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi L 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
L 200ModelXC90
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
167 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
136 HPPower163 HP
314 NmTorque340 Nm
—Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank68 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5185 mmLength4807 mm
1750 mmWidth1936 mm
1775 mmHeight1784 mm
1870 KgWeight2139 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi L 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…