DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSuzuki
L 200ModelGrand Vitara
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
167 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2393 cc
136 HPPower166 HP
314 NmTorque225 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption11,0 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size225/70 R16 102S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5185 mmLength4060 mm
1750 mmWidth1810 mm
1775 mmHeight1695 mm
1870 KgWeight1521 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…